Saturday, March 20, 2010

JOR EL ISTANBUL'S FIRST OFFICIAL EARTHQUAKE PREPARATION DAY

Yesterday Cağri and I celebrated Istanbul's first Jor El Earthquake Preparation Day. We declared the holiday yesterday morning.

First, we did our own earthquake preparation. We went down to Kadiköy to buy high-powered flashlights, radios, a big stock of batteries, and other obvious things to have on hand. (Anyone who wants a list of things they should do if they live in a seismically active zone, feel free to contact me or check the tab in the Notes section of the Jor El Facebook page.) We arranged to have someone come over and secure my heavy furniture to the wall. I've still got to get a few more things, but those were the most important.

We both noted how much better we felt for having done the basic preparation. You can't control everything, but it takes a big weight off to know you've controlled what you reasonably can. Denial saps energy. Pushing the thought, "I'm not prepared" out of your head is actually a lot of work.

We then went to the Bereketzade muhtar to discuss the neighborhood's earthquake plans. For those who don't live here, the muhtarlık is the smallest level of local government--the neighborhood councilman, in effect. I was very curious to see how well this would work. All things considered, I thought it went very well.

Cağri was initially annoyed because he wasn't where he was supposed to be: His daughter was in the office, but didn't know where he was or what to do in his absence. But we found him pretty quickly; he was selling real estate down the street. Cağri was fit to be tied by this, asking me why a local elected official thought he should be unavailable to the public and pursuing another job on taxpayer time, but I didn't think it was all that problematic, really. We found him quickly, and he was very willing to talk to us and take what we were saying seriously. A note on his office door saying, "I'm two blocks down the street selling real estate, but here's my number, and my door down the street is always open to the public" would have been nice, but it certainly wasn't impossible for a determined local resident to find him.

At the suggestion of one of Jor El's members, we brought him a nice box of lokum. He seemed delighted to speak to us (if perhaps slightly saddened that we didn't want to buy real estate). We explained why we were there. He at first said that there was nothing the local government could do: We were lucky, on the one hand, because the ground in our neighborhood was good, but there was no local helicopter landing port, no emergency plan, no storehouse with emergency supplies. So we had best all just pray it never happens.

We explained that actually there was quite a bit we could do. I mentioned encouraging people, for example, to secure their heavy items to walls (and pointed to his unsecured cabinets), making sure they had information about the importance of moving heavy furniture away from their beds, reminding them to stock up on food and water, telling people what to do during and in the immediate aftermath of a quake. We gave him pamphlets and literature from MAY, and invited him to come to our meeting with MAY on the 25th. He seemed very enthusiastic, and agreed to come or to send someone on his behalf.

I thought this was highly encouraging. I really believe people want to know how to survive an earthquake, and are happy to learn that there are things they can do, personally, to protect themselves and their families.

Cağri was demoralized, however, because a woman in his office -- we have no idea who she was -- told us that we should stop worrying about it and trust in God, who would protect us from earthquakes if our faith was sufficient. She scolded us for trying to panic people and intimated that I must have an ulterior motive in this, seeing as I was American.

As I said to Cağri afterwards -- sure, people will say that. If many people here didn't think that way, there would be no problem to solve, right? But I thought the main thing, the important thing, was the muhtar's receptiveness to the message and his willingness to work with us.

I'm curious to know how other people's visits have gone.


Thursday, March 11, 2010

I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GROW ANTHRAX, EITHER, BUDDY

I know it's kind of a cliche to marvel at the weirdness of the search terms that have led people to your blog, but "My AK-47 keeps jamming" really does stand out.

He's in Florida, and I kind of doubt his neighbors want him to solve this problem.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Mücadeleyi Öğrenme

5 Mart 2010, Cuma

1100 ÖĞRENCİSİ OLAN BİR OKUL

Geçen Çarşamba günü yüz yüze gerçekleşen ilk Jor El İstanbul toplantısının iyi bir başlangıç olduğunu düşünüyorum. Hepimiz İstanbul depreminin taşıdığı ciddi risk ve İstanbul deprem/felaket hazırlıklarının yetersizliği konusunda hemfikiriz.

MAY ve LIDAM projeleri genel koordinatörü ile 25 Mart günü 16:30-18:00 saatleri arasında Gayrettepe’de görüşeceğiz. Ayrıca bireysel olarak mahalle muhtarlarımızla da teke tek görüşüp kendi bölgelerimizin deprem hazırlıkları konusunda bilgi sahibi olmayı planlıyoruz. Muhtarlarımıza bu planlar ve geliştirilmeleri konusunda işbirliği yapmayı önereceğiz. Ayrıca bu çalışmaları bölgemizdeki diğer insanlara anlatmayı amaçlıyoruz.

Toplantıda oldukça sarsıcı noktalar dile getirildi. Grubun diğer üyelerinin de bu noktaların saptanmasına katkıda bulunacaklarını umuyorum. Bu önemli noktaların İngilizce değil, Türkçe paylaşılması gerekir. Ancak benim Türkçem bunun için yetersiz.

Öne çıkan konular arasında en çarpıcı olanı şuydu: Bir grup üyesinin ifadesine göre Kâğıthane’deki bir okulun güçlendirme çalışmalarının yapılmış olmasına rağmen bina hiç de güvenli değil. Güçlendirme çalışması için 350.000 TL harcanmış ama binanın temeli sadece 16 cm derinliğinde. Bu üyemiz, güçlendirme işinin kontrolünü üstlenen mühendisin de “Ben çocuğumu bu okula göndermem” dediğini sözlerine ekledi. Ayrıca bu durumun güçlendirildiği söylenen pek çok okul için de geçerli olduğuna inandığını belirtti.

Fazla ayrıntıya girmek istemediği için bu üyemizin söylediklerini hemen kanıtlayamam. Ancak doğruluk ihtimalinin bulunması bile ciddi biçimde konunun üzerine gidilmesi için bence yeterli bir nedendir. Okuldaki 1100 öğrencinin aileleri çocuklarının okulda güvende olduğuna inanıyorlar. Eğer okul güvenli değilse, ailelerin bunu bilmeye hakkı var ve çocuklar orada bulunmamalı.

Büyük bir depremde yeterince güçlendirilmemiş okullarda neler olduğuna bakalım:

Haiti depreminde yerle bir olan okullar, pek çok kişi için daha iyi bir geleceğin umutlarını da söndürdü.

Çin depremi: Neden o kadar çok okul yıkıldı?

Okula ulaştıklarında, dehşetle, tüm binanın yerle bir olduğunu gördüler.

Pasternak, üç katlı bir bina olan okulun, üzerinde yürünebilecek bir moloz yığını haline geldiğini söyledi.

Deprem anında, bina içinde, aralarında yetim ve engellilerin de bulunduğu yüzlerce çocuk olduğunu söyledi.

Gece boyunca ellerinde hiçbir alet ya da makine olmaksızın çocukları enkazdan çıkarmaya çalıştılar. Sabah olduğunda, 25 yaralı ve 30 cansız beden çıkarabilmişlerdi.

Bina unufak olduğundan içeride kaç çocuğun olduğunu hiç kimse kesin olarak bilmiyordu, ancak Pasternak 50-100 çocuğun depremden hemen sonra kaçıp uzaklaştığını, bunun da enkaz altında halen 50-200 çocuk bulunduğu anlamına geldiğini belirtti.

Pasternak, daha önce Haiti’de gönüllü olarak çalışan 65 yaşındaki San Rafaelli

emekli öğretmen Wander’in de bitmez tükenmez bir gayretle çalıştığını söyledi.

Wander inatla, azimle çalışıyordu. Florance Nightingale kimliğine bürünmüş, ölmek üzere olan çocuklara yetişip kurtarmaya gayret ediyordu.

Wander aynı zamanda ölen çocukların resimlerini çekip kimlik tespitini kolaylaştırmayı düşünebilecek kadar da aklı başında davranmıştı.

Bu yetersiz okul güçlendirmesinin doğru olabileceği ve eğer öyleyse, bu konuda bir şeyler yapmanın hepimizin sosyal/etik bir sorumluluğu olduğu konusunda kuşkusu olan var mı?

Bu konuda daha fazla bilgi edinmeme yardımcı olabilecek kimse varmı?

Sunday, March 7, 2010

ONE MORE IDEA FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF CONSTRUCTION CRIME IN TURKEY

This is something I thought of a while ago; perhaps it's worth revisiting. As Anne Applebaum points out,

Before the quake, Chile also had regulations in place that required contractors to construct all new buildings to earthquake-resistant standards. Not every structure met the standards, but many did. And residents of those that did not will have some recourse: In the city of Concepción, residents of a new building that collapsed completely are threatening to take their builders to court, according to one report. The fact that they are even discussing this option implies that these apartment owners believe they have a court system that works, a legal system that could force builders to pay compensation, and a building regulatory system that is generally respected. Haiti has none of the above.


Turkey has some of the above, but not nearly enough. The average Turkish citizen wants nothing to do with the court system, believing it intimidating, incomprehensible, rigged, and vastly too expensive and time-consuming to use -- which it is. I speak from personal experience of taking a construction company to court.

The biggest problem is that it simply costs too much to sue someone. The cost of opening a lawsuit represents a substantial portion of an average Turk's annual income.

This article suggests a free-market solution to that problem. I wonder if it might be possible to start a profit-making company that invests in lawsuits?

Basically, since the idea of a lawsuit taken on a contingency basis doesn't exist here, it would be a way of filling that gap.

The idea has an obvious huge advantage over starting a legal aid society: There would be no need to appeal to anyone's good will. Profit would be the incentive, and you can always count on that as a strong incentive.

Any Turkish legal experts have any thoughts about the feasibility of this?

Friday, March 5, 2010

MINUTES FROM WEDNESDAY'S MEETING

With thanks to Asli Suner.

Asli Suner Katılımcılar / Attendees:

Claire Berlinski - CB
Cagrı Sert - CS
Aslı Suner - AS
Ahmet Turhan Altıner - ATA
Bayram Yıldızoğlu - BY
Ender Ülker - EU
Aziz Nazmi Şakir - ANS
İbrahim Yıldırım - IY
Barbaros Bey - B

Konular / Issues Discussed:

1. Deprem felaketine hazırlık stratejilerinde farklı düzeylerde yaklaşımların gerekliliği tartışıldı. ATA Mahalle ölçeğinden başlamanın en doğru yöntem olduğunu ifade etti.
Görev: Katılımcıların herbirinin kendi mahalle muhtarları ile iletişime geçip, o mahalenin acil durum anındaki aksiyon ve kaöış planlarını öğrenmeleri. Muhatraların bu projeye dahil edilebilmeleri için bilgilendirilmeleri. Bir sonraki toplantıda bu bilgilerin tartışılması

(Levels of preparedness approaches are discussed. ATA suggested the best way be to start at "Neighborhood Level" involving 'Muhtar's.
Task: Per ATA's suggestion each attendee should talk to their muhtar and collect information for emergency plans for each neighborhood as a starting point to be then discussed at the next meeting.)

2. Hali hazırda varolan ve benzer konularda çalışan gruplar, dernekler ya da STKlar ile kontağa geçilmesine dair fikirler tartışıldı.
Görev: AS Architecture for Humanity'nin Istanbul grubu ile kontağa geçecek. Onların yaklaşık bir senedir süre gelen çalısmalarını öğrenip, ortak çalışma imkanlarını araştıracak.
ATA MAG ( Mahalle Afet Gönüllüleri -http://www.mag.org.tr/tur/mag.as ) ile bağlantı kurdu. 25.03.2010 tarihinde, saat 16:30 da Gayrettepe Muhtarlığında bir tanışma toplantısı organize etti. Konu ile ilgili davet ilgilenenlere facebook üzerinden gönderilecek.

(Ideas and possibilities for joining existing groups / NGOs in the field of preparedness and awareness for disasters are discussed:
Task: AS to connect with Istanbul chapter of Architecture for Humanity to see for possibilities of a collaboration. or joining the group as a subgroup focused on earthquake preparedness/awarness
ATA to connect the group with MAG (http://www.mag.org.tr/eng/mag.html ). A meeting is already set up by ATA to take place on 25.03.2010 at Gayrettepe Muhtarlık to learn from their efforts so far )

3. B deprem afetine yönelik biliçlendirmeyi arttırmak ve acil durum anlarında yapılması gerekenler konusunda bilgilendirmek üzere basit garfiklerle sunulan bir broşür hazırlanmasını tavsiye etti. Dağıtım için gazeteleri devreye sokup, broşürleri geniş bir kitleye dağıtabileceğimizi önerdi.
AS tasarım grupları ve de okullarının bu gibi konularda dahil edilebileceğinden bahsetti. Öğrenciler çeşitli projeler vasıtasıyla bu çalışmalara gönüllü ya da okul ile katılabilirler. AS AFH-Istanbul grubu ile bu konuda da konuşacak. Onların okullar ile olan bağlantılarından yararlanmanın yollarını araştıracak.
B media grupları ile bağlantıyı üstlenecek.

(B suggested to prepare a simple brochure raising awareness and showing ways for preparedness in a simple graphic form and use media's help to distribute it in masses.
AS suggested to involve designers or design schools and potentially use students as part of such project. AFH- Istanbul can be a bridge as they are already in touch with some schools.
B to help with media connection.)

4. BY birkaç senedir süregelen DDS ( Deprem Duvar Sistemi ) konusunda grubu bilgilendirdi.

(BY explained the DDS product as a retrofitting solution at a bigger scale)

5. İnşaat sektöründeki sorumsuz yapım teknikleri ve yetersiz statik çözümleri üzerine tartışıldı. Kağıthane'de bir okul projesinde şahit olduğu yetersiz temel sorunundan bahsetti.
CB bu konuda gazeteci olarak raporlamak isteğini dile getirdi. Daha fazla bilgi ve kanıt çerçevesinde IY da bu tarz opersyonların önlenmesi konusunda yardımcı olabileceğini ifade etti.

(Irresponsible operations in construction industry are discussed. An example was given of a school in Kağıthane with inadequate foundation.
CB wants to report on it. With further evidence IY can also build some pressure.)

6. Jor El Istanbul grubunun yaptıgı çalışmaların organize olması ile oluşturulabılecek bir prezantasyonun ilçe başkanlıkları ve üst kurumlarında sunulabileceği konusunda yardımcı olabileceğini ifade etti. Bu sayede belediyeler ya da valililk düzeyinde konunun yayılması ve çalışılmasına önayak olunabilir.

(IY suggested that Jor El Istanbul efforts can be put in a presentation and he can arrange some meetings at the governing levels to present ideas and action strategies in pursuit of their involvement.)

7. ATA Istanbul'daki okulların büyük çoğunluğunda kaçış kapılarının içeriye doğru açıldığına dikkat çekti. Bu acil durumlarda büyük problemlere yol açan bir problem. Ucuz maliyetle ve hızlı bir islem ile kapı yönleri değiştirilebilir. Bu konuda devlet tarafından bir yaptırım gerekir.

(ATA mentioned that most schools have their escape doors swinging in, which causes a major problem during emergencies. It's a low-cost, easy-to-implent strategy to switch swings to open out, which needs to be mandated by governing agencies. )

8. Acil durum tatbikatlarının eksikliği tartışıldı.

(Issue about lack of drills raised.)

9. Kriz öncesi kartografi çalışmalarının gerekliliği ve yöntemleri tartışıldı. Bu konuda varolan sistemlerin ( Ushahidi -http://www.ushahidi.com/ ve Frontline SMS -http://www.frontlinesms.com/ ) araştırılmasına karar verildi. Bu konuda tecrübesi olan ya da bilgisayar programacısı arkadaşların konuya dahil olmalarını bekliyoruz.

(Advanced Crisis Mapping ideas are discussed. Further study of existing systems and ways of adaptations to be investigated. Computer programmers from the group are encouraged to get involved with this.)

A SCHOOL WITH 1,100 KIDS IN IT

I thought the first in-person meeting of Jor El Istanbul, last Wednesday, was a good start. We are certainly all of like mind about the seriousness of the risk and the inadequacy of Istanbul's disaster planning.

We'll be meeting the general coordinator of the MAY and LIDAH projects on March 25 from 16:30-18:00 in Gayrettepe. We plan also, individually, to meet our local muhtars to learn more about our own neighborhoods' disaster preparation. We'll offer to cooperate with them to improve these plans and communicate the plans to other people in our neighborhoods.

Several very disturbing points came up. I'm hoping other members of the group will contribute to listing them: These are points that should be made public in Turkish, not English. My Turkish really isn't good enough.

By far the most disturbing point was this. A member of the group is certain that a school in Kağıthane that is said to have been retrofitted has not in fact been made secure. He said that 350,000 YTL was spent to retrofit the school, but the foundation is still only 16 cm. deep. He also said that the engineer who supervised the work told him, "I wouldn't send my children here." He believed this to be true of many schools that have supposedly been retrofitted.

He wasn't willing to discuss the details of this. I can't confirm, immediately, that the story is true. But the possibility that it's true is enough to make me think this should be investigated aggressively. The parents of those 1,100 children believe their kids are safe in that school. If they're not, those parents are entitled to know -- and those children shouldn't be in there.

This is what happens in a major earthquake to schools that are not properly secured:

China's quake: Why did so many schools collapse?


As the school came into view, they were horrified to see that it had collapsed.

"What had been a three-story building was a ramp, you could walk up it," Pasternak said.

He said there were likely several hundred children inside at the time of the collapse, including numerous orphans and disabled children.

They worked overnight to pull children from the rubble, without the help of tools or machinery. By morning, they had pulled out about 25 wounded children and the bodies of nearly 30 children who had died.

No one has an exact count of how many children were inside the building when it crumbled, but Pasternak said about 50-100 were seen fleeing the school after the quake, meaning that between 50 and 200 children were still underneath the rubble.

Pasternak said Wander, a 65-year-old former San Rafael schoolteacher who has volunteered periodically in Haiti for about the past decade, worked tirelessly.

"She was on absolute overdrive of wanting to help," he said. "She was Florence Nightingale. She was out there trying to rescue some of the kids who were obviously dying."

Wander also had the presence of mind to photograph the deceased children to identify them later, he said.
Does anyone doubt that if the story of the inadequate retrofitting of this school is true, we all have a moral responsibility to do something about it? Now?

Is there anyone who will help me find out more about this?




Friday, February 26, 2010

JOR EL ISTANBUL

I've created a Facebook group for people who are concerned about the seismic hazard to Istanbul. Please feel free to join it.


Thursday, February 25, 2010

In Quake-Prone Cities, Quick Growth Invites Disaster

I'm encouraged to see so much attention to this in the media. That's a start.


The New York Times
February 25, 2010

In Quake-Prone Cities, Quick Growth Invites Disaster

ISTANBUL — As he surveys the streets of this sprawling mega-city, Mustafa Erdik, the director of an earthquake engineering institute here, says he sometimes feels like a doctor scanning a crowded hospital ward.

It is not so much the city’s modern core, where two sleek Trump Towers and a huge airport terminal were built to withstand a major earthquake that is considered all but inevitable in the next few decades. Nor does Dr. Erdik agonize over Istanbul’s ancient monuments, whose yards-thick walls have largely withstood more than a dozen potent seismic blows over the past two millenniums.

25quakespan-cnd-articleLarge.jpg

His biggest worry is that tens of thousands of buildings throughout the city, erected in a haphazard, uninspected rush as the population soared past 10 million from the 1 million it was just 50 years ago, are what some seismologists call “rubble in waiting.”

“Earthquakes always find the weakest point,” said Dr. Erdik, a professor at Bogazici University here.

Istanbul is one of a host of quake-threatened cities in the developing world where populations have swelled far faster than the capacity to house them safely, setting them up for disaster of a scope that could, in some cases, surpass the devastation in Haiti from last month’s earthquake.

Roger Bilham, a seismologist at the University of Colorado who has spent decades studying major earthquakes around the world, including the recent quake in Haiti, said that the planet’s growing, urbanizing population, projected to swell by two billion more people by midcentury and to require one billion dwellings, faced “an unrecognized weapon of mass destruction: houses.”

Without vastly expanded efforts to change construction practices and educate people, from mayors to masons, on simple ways to bolster structures, he said, Haiti’s tragedy is almost certain to be surpassed sometime this century when a major quake hits Karachi, Pakistan, Katmandu, Nepal, Lima, Peru, or one of a long list of big poor cities facing inevitable major earthquakes.

In Tehran, Iran’s capital, Dr. Bilham has calculated that one million people could die in a predicted quake similar in intensity to the one in Haiti, which the Haitian government estimates killed 230,000. (Some Iranian geologists have pressed their government for decades to move the capital because of the nest of surrounding geologic faults.)

As for Istanbul, a study led by Dr. Erdik mapped out a situation in which a quake could kill 30,000 to 40,000 people and seriously injure 120,000 at the very minimum.

The city is rife with buildings with glaring flaws, like ground floors with walls or columns removed to make way for store displays, or a succession of illegal new floors added in each election period on the presumption that local officials will look the other way. On many blocks, upper floors jut precariously over the sidewalk, taking advantage of an old permitting process that governed only a building’s footprint.

Worse, Dr. Erdik said, as with a doctor’s patients, not all of the potentially deadly problems are visible from the outside, and thousands more buildings are presumed to be at risk. “Little details are very important,” he said. “To say that a building is in bad condition is easy. To say that one is safe is hard.”

Some of Turkey’s biggest builders have readily admitted to using shoddy materials and bad practices in the urban construction boom. In an interview last year with the Turkish publication Referans, Ali Agaoglu, a Turkish developer ranked 468th last year on the Forbes list of billionaires, described how in the 1970s, salty sea sand and scrap iron were routinely used in buildings made of reinforced concrete.

“At that time, this was the best material,” he said, according to a translation of the interview. “Not just us, but all companies were doing the same thing. If an earthquake occurs in Istanbul, not even the army will be able to get in.”

Echoing other engineers and planners trying to reduce Istanbul’s vulnerability, Dr. Erdik said that the best hope, considering the scale of the problem, might well be that economic advancement would happen fast enough that property owners could replace the worst housing stock before the ground heaved.

“If the quake gives us some time, we can reduce the losses just through turnover,” Dr. Erdik said. “If it happens tomorrow, there’ll be a huge number of deaths.”

But when a potent quake hit 50 miles away in 1999, killing more than 18,000 people, including 1,000 on the outskirts of Istanbul, the city was reminded that time might not be on its side. That earthquake occurred on the North Anatolian fault, which runs beneath the Marmara Sea, just a few miles from the city’s crowded southern flanks.

The fault, which is very similar to the San Andreas fault in California, appears to have a pattern of successive failures, meaning the section near Istanbul is probably primed to fail, said Tom Parsons, who has studied the fault for the United States Geological Survey.

Istanbul stands out among threatened cities in developing countries because it is trying to get ahead of the risk.

A first step was an earthquake master plan drawn up for the city and the federal government by Dr. Erdik’s team and researchers at three other Turkish universities in 2006. Such a plan is a rarity outside of rich cities like Tokyo and Los Angeles.

Carrying out its long list of recommendations has proved more challenging, given that the biggest source of political pressure in Istanbul, as with most crowded cities, is not an impending earthquake but traffic, crime, jobs and other real-time troubles.

Nonetheless, with the urgency amplified by the lessons from Haiti’s devastation, Istanbul is doing what it can to gird for its own disaster.

The effort to prepare is coming from the top, with tighter building codes, mandatory earthquake insurance and loans from international development banks for buttressing or replacing vulnerable schools and other public buildings.

But a push is also coming from the bottom, as nonprofit groups, recognizing the limits of centralized planning, train dozens of teams of volunteers in poor districts and outfit them with radios, crowbars and first-aid kits so they can dig into the wreckage when their neighborhoods are shaken.

Mahmut Bas, who leads the city’s Directorate of Earthquake and Ground Analysis, is charged with consolidating and coordinating everything from building inspections to emergency response. Yet the bureaucracy is almost as sprawling and inefficient as the dizzying web of smog-shrouded streets, clogged with an estimated six million vehicles.

Mr. Bas said collapsing buildings were just one of many threats. One prediction about a potent quake concluded that 30,000 natural gas lines were likely to rupture. “If just 10 percent catch fire, that’s 3,000 fires,” he said, adding that the city’s fire stations are able to handle at most 30 to 40 fires in one day.

Still, keeping vital structures standing — those fire stations, hospitals and schools — remains the prime priority.

Under a program financed with more than $800 million in loans from the World Bank and the European Investment Bank, and more in the pipeline from other international sources, Turkey is in the early stages of bolstering hundreds of the most vulnerable schools in Istanbul, along with important public buildings and more than 50 hospitals.

With about half of the nearly 700 schools assessed as high priorities retrofitted or replaced so far, progress is too slow to suit many Turkish engineers and geologists tracking the threat. But in districts where the work has been done or is under way — those closest to the Marmara Sea and the fault — students, parents and teachers express a sense of relief tempered by the knowledge that renovations only cut the odds of calamity.

“I hope it’s enough,” said Serkan Erdogan, an English teacher at the Bakirkoy Cumhuriyet primary school close to the Marmara coast, where $315,000 was spent to add reinforced walls, jackets of fresh concrete and steel rebar around old columns and to make adjustments as simple as changing classroom doors to open outward, easing evacuations.

“The improvements are great, but the building may still collapse,” he said. “We have to learn how to live with that risk. The children need to know what they should do.”

In a fifth-grade classroom, the student training that goes with the structural repairs was evident as Nazan Sati, a social worker, asked the 11-year-olds what they would do if an earthquake struck right at that moment.

At first a forest of hands shot toward the ceiling. Ms. Sati quickly told them to show, not tell. In a mad, giggling scramble, the students dove beneath their desks.

But the threat for children, and their parents, also lies outside the school walls, in mile upon mile of neighborhoods filled with structures called gecekondu, meaning “landed overnight,” because they were constructed seemingly instantly as hundreds of thousands of migrants from rural regions flowed into the city seeking work in the past decade or two.

That kind of construction is commonplace in many of the world’s most unstable seismic zones. Dr. Bilham at the University of Colorado has estimated that an engineer is involved in just 3 percent of the construction under way around the world.

Peter Yanev, who has advised the World Bank and the insurance industry on earthquake engineering and is the author of “Peace of Mind in Earthquake Country,” noted that in Turkey and other developing countries, even when someone with an engineering degree was involved, that was no guarantee of safe construction because there was little specialized training or licensing.

In the face of such problems, efforts are under way in Istanbul’s crowded working-class and poor neighborhoods to train and equip several thousand volunteers to be ready to respond when, not if, the worst happens.

On a sunny Saturday morning, Mustafa Elvan Cantekin, who directs the Neighborhood Disaster Support Project, navigated back streets to meet with one team deep in the city’s Bagcilar district, where one estimate projects that some 4,200 people would be likely to die in a major earthquake.

Dr. Cantekin, a Turkish engineer educated at Texas A&M University and tested in the 1999 earthquake zone, has helped create 49 neighborhood teams in the city, each with a shipping container loaded with crowbars, generators, stretchers and other emergency gear.

Through the project, paid for by a Swiss development agency and private companies, he has traveled to Morocco, Jordan and Iran to help initiate programs there based on Istanbul’s.

A map on his lap showed that the neighborhood was on the border of red and orange danger zones delineating the worst seismic risks. He pointed to one building after another where there was no permanent roof but instead columns poking skyward in anticipation of a landlord finding a new tenant and adding yet another unlicensed floor — and another layer of risk.

As his car crawled through mazes of traffic-choked streets, Mr. Cantekin said the harsh reality for the dozens of small communities within a mega-city, as with the residents of shattered towns in Sichuan Province in China after the 2008 earthquake there, was that they would have to be self-reliant when the quake hit.

“China has the biggest civil defense capability in the world, but it still took three or four days to reach the collapsed towns,” he said. “If there is the big one here, you are all alone to cope with whatever you have, at least for the first 72 hours.”

Outside a community center where children sat at computers playing Farmville on Facebook, Mr. Cantekin inspected the container contents with the team leader, Cuma Cetin, 36, a father of five and a factory worker.

“We’re not waiting for the disaster,” Mr. Cetin said as he and his team, dressed in orange coveralls, accompanied Mr. Cantekin while he pointed out fatal flaws in nearby buildings.

Along an avenue that was a stream bed four decades ago, in a spot where houses were built on sediment instead of bedrock and thus particularly vulnerable, Mr. Cantekin led the team into a ground-floor area beneath four stories of apartments with laundry flapping in the breeze on balcony after balcony.

The columns holding up this part of the building are too thin, he said, pointing to cracks that have already scarred the concrete surface.

“This is one of the first to go,” Mr. Cantekin said, before they walked on to the next one.


Tuesday, February 23, 2010

"In recent earthquakes, buildings have acted as weapons of mass destruction,"

Under the world's greatest cities, deadly plates


Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Megacities are something new on the planet. Earthquakes are something very old. The two are a lethal combination, as seen in the recent tragedy in Port-au-Prince, where more than 200,000 people perished -- a catastrophe that scientists say is certain to be repeated somewhere, and probably soon, with death tolls that once again stagger the mind.

***

n many vulnerable cities, people are effectively stacked on top of one another in buildings designed as if earthquakes don't happen. It is not the tremor that kills people in an earthquake but the buildings, routinely constructed on the cheap, using faulty designs and, in some cities, overseen by corrupt inspectors. The difference between life and death is often a matter of how much sand went into the cement or how much steel into a supporting column. Earthquakes might be viewed as acts of God, but their lethality is often a function of masonry.

"In recent earthquakes, buildings have acted as weapons of mass destruction," Bilham writes in the journal Nature.

***

Brian Tucker, an earth scientist who leads GeoHazards International, said 10 percent of the money going to help Haiti rebuild should be dedicated to mitigating the destruction in earthquakes. But he also knows from many years of sounding warnings about possible earthquakes that people tend to be complacent about catastrophes that have yet to happen.

"People who advocate diet and exercise are chumps, and heart surgeons are heroes," Tucker said.

Bilham said he would like to see the United Nations develop a building-inspection program akin to its efforts to look for banned nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. Zoback, likewise, is impatient for action that could save lives:

"We know where the problems are. We know what to do. We know how to fix it. We just need the political will."

New construction after quake in Turkey on shaky ground

Many buildings in Turkey risk being destroyed in an earthquake because the law passed after the 1999 quake covers only 19 provinces. In 62 provinces, many of which are in first-degree quake zones, 10 to 30 percent of buildings are below standard and are structurally vulnerable. Experts are calling for a new countrywide system of standards and controls on construction
New construction after quake in Turkey on shaky ground

The general advice for people seeking a house in Turkey to find one built after the 1999 Marmara earthquake may sound solid, but the wisdom doesn’t hold true in 62 provinces.

It is common for people to prefer a house built after the earthquake because of the popular belief that legislation passed shortly after the quake strengthened construction control mechanisms and the quality of buildings. But a recently revealed report by the Public Works Ministry nulls that idea.

Buildings in 62 provinces are under threat of being destroyed in an earthquake because they fall short of structural standards implemented in Turkey’s other 19 provinces after the 1999 Marmara quake, according to the “Residence Control Report.”

The daily Radikal disclosed the report and wrote that it had been hidden like a secret. According to the report, between 10 and 30 percent of houses in the 62 provinces are under risk while the situation in the 19 provinces is positive because the construction controls were properly applied.

"This report clearly indicates that the law on controlling construction cannot sufficiently provide a reliable control mechanism. The ministry has been too slow to offer proper regulations. The control process has completely broken down,” Eyüp Muhçu, head of the Istanbul Chamber of Architects, told the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

In Turkey’s 81 provinces, the ministry inspected more than 3,200 buildings to test their bearing capacity and other relevant issues. At least 40 buildings in each province were checked. There has been a significant rise in the quality of buildings in the 19 provinces where the controls are in place, the report concluded. The ministry also determined that in the 19 provinces a test that measures the elasticity capacity of steel material was performed in around 97 percent of the buildings.

But when it comes to the provinces outside the jurisdiction of the law, the ministry’s report reveals a tragic picture. Although in a quake zone, many buildings in eastern Anatolian cities are arguably waiting to be destroyed in an earthquake. The percentage of buildings with improperly built load-bearing systems is between 10 and 30 percent.

Moreover, the percentage of buildings that underwent proper testing to measure structural strength was low in those cities. The provinces outside of the law but in first-degree quake zones are the Anatolian provinces of Şırnak, Hakkâri, Siirt, Muş, Bingöl, Adıyaman, Kahramanmaraş, Tunceli, Erzincan, Tokat, Amasya, Çankırı, Karabük, Bilecik, Muğla, Afyon, Uşak, Burdur, Isparta. Meanwhile, the 19 pilot provinces are Adana, Ankara, Antalya, Aydın, Balıkesir, Bolu, Bursa, Çanakkale, Denizli, Düzce, Eskişehir, Gaziantep, Hatay, İstanbul, İzmir, Kocaeli, Sakarya, Tekirdağ and Yalova.

The report was presented to Public Works Minister Mustafa Demir a couple of months ago, but nothing was done to bring all the provinces under an efficient control mechanism, daily Radikal reported.

“We urgently need a new system to restore control over construction. The current mechanism is not working properly. It is still unclear whether institutions that are supposed to implement control mechanisms are using objective criteria,” said Tayfun Kahraman, head of the Istanbul Chamber of City Planners.

Istanbul Chamber of Architect’s head Muhcu also said Turkey needs a new countrywide control process based on scientific principles and more participation if the country is to have a reliable control system for construction. “It should be a countrywide control process rather than a system based on pilot-region practices,” he said.

“Everything should be changed and we need a new law to make these drastic changes,” said Kahraman, adding that the builders should consult experts like city planners, engineers and architects.

Muhcu said the control mechanism under the current law does not work as it should. “Even buildings constructed by state-run institutions and TOKİ [the Housing Development Administration] are not within the scope of this law,” he said.

“Universities, municipalities and all actors along the control process should contribute to a new system that can be implemented in all provinces across the country,” he said.